Flip.ro extends its security testing beyond standard coverage
Already testing
KODA
Atlas
NotaryAI
Platform
Manual-depth pentesting,
delivered as software.
- Authenticates into your app, reasons about each parameter, generates targeted test cases.
- Continuously tests every deploy - 3-6h runtime vs. 2-4 weeks for manual pentests.
- Compliance-ready PDF + JSON report with AI remediation guidance for every finding.
What you get
A full pentest in under 24 hours.
Scope, deliverables and turnaround for every engagement are set out on our AI penetration testing services page.
FIG 0.1
Compliance-ready Reports
Every report meets NIS 2, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 standards. Hand it directly to your auditor or board. See the compliance frameworks we cover.
SOC 2 Type II ISO 27001 NIS 2 ready
FIG 0.2
State-of-the-art detection
Authenticated, context-aware testing that maps every endpoint and reasons about each parameter individually - finding the business-logic flaws automated scanners miss.
FIG 0.3
Remediation guidance
The AI walks you step by step through fixing every vulnerability - no security expertise required.
FIG 0.4
Hours not weeks
A full pentest delivered in a few hours. Traditional firms take 2-4 weeks and charge $10k-$30k.
Hackers use AI. You should use it too.
Attackers no longer probe manually. AI scans thousands of targets and exploits them around the clock. A yearly pentest can't keep up.
Validated against
industry-standard benchmarks.
The methodology and the full results are in our benchmark research.
100%
OWASP Top 10 coverage
12/12
Vulnerability classes found on DVWA
-90%
Up to 90% lower pentest cost
What we find
Every class. Every release.
OWASP Top 10 to framework-specific bugs. Each finding validated with a reproducible exploit before it reaches your queue.
SQL InjectionCWE-89Cross-Site ScriptingCWE-79Server-Side Template InjectionCWE-1336Server-Side Request ForgeryCWE-918Broken Object Level AuthorizationCWE-639Insecure Direct Object ReferenceCWE-639OS Command InjectionCWE-78XML External EntityCWE-611Path TraversalCWE-22Insecure DeserializationCWE-502Authentication BypassCWE-287Privilege EscalationCWE-269JWT ForgeryCWE-347OAuth MisconfigurationCWE-1390Mass AssignmentCWE-915Prototype PollutionCWE-1321Race ConditionsCWE-362Open RedirectCWE-601ClickjackingCWE-1021CSRFCWE-352LDAP InjectionCWE-90NoSQL InjectionCWE-943XPath InjectionCWE-643HTTP SmugglingCWE-444Cache PoisoningCWE-444GraphQL IntrospectionCWE-200Webhook SpoofingCWE-345Session FixationCWE-384Brute Force Protection MissingCWE-307Missing Security HeadersCWE-16Information DisclosureCWE-200
+ 200 more · New classes added every week
Case studies
Six named customers
Why each organisation commissioned a penetration test, what the report contained, and what it enabled.
From the blog
What we found, and how we found it.
Field notes from real engagements: what the scanners missed, what the fix was, and what the frameworks actually ask for.
Startup Security
How to Manage Security Without a Dedicated Team
In a small company security work is spread across existing roles, and that holds until a task falls between two of them. A named owner and an honest time allocation are what stop an access review from belonging to nobody.
Compliance
How to Prepare and Answer a Customer Security Questionnaire
A questionnaire pulls in engineering, HR and legal at once, and the first one always costs the most. What makes the second one cheaper is a library of answers someone has already checked.
Supply Chain
arrayref: 86 Minutes of Compromise
At 07:15 UTC on August 20, 2026, arrayref 0.3.10 appeared on crates.io, and within about 23 minutes, poisoned releases of internment 0.8.7 and append-only-vec 0.1.9 appeared. From the outside, everything looked like regular point releases of trusted packages.